When White Privilege Becomes White Power
The story of York Region District School Board Trustee Nancy
Elgie has taken some disturbing turns since the December 8th, 2016, revelation
that she used the "N" word in reference to local parent. The
remark was made privately, days before, at a public meeting where York Region parent Charline Grant was in attendance. Ms Grant previously had launched a human rights
complaint, charging that her son had been the victim of racist treatment in his school. The
private comment was soon reported to the parent, and the board initiated an
investigation.
In the early stages, Mrs Elgie denied ever having made the
remark. The Toronto Star's Kristin Rushowy and Noor Javed write:
Elgie, 82, could not be reached for comment on Thursday. However, reached at her home Wednesday, she told the Star “there is no merit in the accusation, but I will co-operate fully in the investigation.”
When asked if she was denying having uttered the slur, she responded: “I’m not saying anything like that... I’m just saying there is no merit in the accusation.” thestar.com.
Trustee Elgie promised, nonetheless, that she would
cooperate with the Board's investigation.
And the story went dark for better part of two months, when Krushowy and Javed reported on the Trustee's written apologies
emailed to Ms Grant and others involved.
“There is no excuse for what I said, only the explanation that I was clumsily trying to refer to your concerns as reported in the media, not to you personally,” said Nancy Elgie of the incident last November when she referred to Charline Grant as a n-----, in public, after a meeting.
“As soon as my brain registered what I had said, I was overcome with shock and dismay. I felt heartsick and deeply ashamed to have said something so hurtful — even unintentionally — and so foreign to the values I have held throughout my entire life,” wrote Elgie, 82, who represents Georgina. thestar.com.
So a two-month investigation into the uttering of an
anti-black racial slur went from Trustee Elgie's claim of "no merit in the
accusation" to her being very sorry for having said it, but it was an
accident.
So what happened during the two months of radio silence?
Toronto journalist Desmond Cole interviewed Charline Grant
on his NewsTalk 1010 radio program, on January 22, 2017. Ms Grant explains that
the board used its "Policy 240" to investigate the incident -- a
policy normally reserved for staff involved in internal workplace matters, and which
mandates no direct action, even in the event of a clear transgression. In other
words, Trustee Elgie's apology is all Ms Grant, her family, and community may
expect from the York Region DSB.
Here's the problem. This isn't an internal matter; it's a very public one -- its disposition a matter of public interest. A trustee
is not an employee. Trustees are elected officials, entrusted to set and
maintain policy, oversee budgets, and supervise the board's director. At the
community level, parents and other stakeholders look to trustees to be their
voice in the boardroom and in the school. Principals and superintendents look
to them to see that their schools get the resources they need from the board.
In this instance, the damage done by Trustee Elgie's words
is by no means limited to Charline Grant and her family. YRDSB that has been
the subject of other charges of anti-Black racism and Islamophobia. Parents in that community are concerned about the safety of
their children in those schools.
This should be the story now, but it isn't.
Enter two of Mrs Elgie's adult children: Stewart Elgie and
Alyson Harrison, both university professors, the latter a neuropsychologist. In
a February 7th, 2017, op-ed piece for The Toronto Star, the siblings plead their mother's
case:
Given the ugly legacy of racism in society, it is not surprising that many people were quick to assume the worst of Nancy, even discounting that she had suffered a head trauma several weeks earlier. Such words — even used accidentally — are painful and hard to forgive.
But since a person’s reputation and life’s work hangs in the balance, we ask you to consider a few facts, and then judge for yourself. thestar.com.
The opinion article was wholly sympathetic to Nancy Elgie, as one would expect of an article written by her children.
But the reality is that the reason all the facts they recounted had not come out yet was because they themselves had chosen not to tell the reporters and had indeed asked the reporters not to report specific details of their mother’s head injury. When her children later decided to disclose more details, they opted to bypass the reporters who would have certainly asked them tough questions about why their mother had continued to work as a trustee. (Emphasis mine.) thestar.com.
Comments
Post a Comment